Saw this today. Adair Turner still thinks there is a chance of limiting global warming well below 2 C Degrees. Positive view for a change.
Full FT article here.
A couple of quotes here:
"Over the next six years, we in the UK are going to see an important test of whether it's possible, because we have a government that is committed to getting to zero grammes of carbon per kWh of electricity. Let's assume that their true target is "near zero", so just 20 grammes of carbon per kWh of electricity, and the date is 2030. I think they will get pretty close."
"My judgment is that if you asked whether we will get to something close to a zero-carbon economy by 2060 or 2070, I think it is inevitable that we will, because we have discovered and developed a set of technologies that are fundamentally superior to the existing fossil-fuel system. And when we get there, we will have an economy that is better for human welfare, including for climate change. Moreover, the impact of having got there on standards of living in 2070 will be so trivial that we won't notice them. They may even be positive in terms of conventionally measured GDP."
"Where is the money going to come from? In the rich world, most of it can come from the private sector, provided other aspects of the economy are appropriately designed - for instance, provided one has appropriate structures for contracting with offshore wind developers and we have carbon prices applied to such processes as steel production. I do not, however, exclude a role for public-private partnerships, or publicly supported funding, even in rich, developed countries. But in the rich countries, you probably could get there even without such ideas, provided you have carbon taxes and what are called "contracts for differences", to ensure predictable prices for wind-generated electricity. The further you go from upper-middle to low-income countries, the greater the amounts of money that will have to come from outside, especially from the global development banks, simply because these countries are exposed to risks - political risks, exchange rate risks, credit risks - that will make the cost of private capital too high to keep renewable energy financially feasible."
What do you think?
------------------------------
Aya Pariy
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 08-07-2024 09:39
From: Jacopo Gadani
Subject: Is Climate Change Losing Political Support?
Dear All,
Together with Francesco, we have prepared the attached article with some current considerations linking sustainability and geopolitcal considerations.
Hope you will enjoy the read and let us know if you will have any comments !
------------------------------
Jacopo Gadani
Vice President ESG Solutions
------------------------------